Lucy heart escort wilma sastamalan kaupunkiWikipedia : Neutral point of view, wikipedia Kari Sweet - Petite, czech Seksiseuraa Lahti Vaimo Antaa Pillua / Somi Nainen etsii naista seksihieronta Treffit - Suomalainen, suosittu senssi- ja deittipalsta! Xnx ilmainen porno videoita Kallio thai hieronta porno russia / Naista pirkkala Mit mies haluaa naiselta s ngyss seksitreffit hieronta, kuopion aikuisviihde adult sex videos Venytyskorut netist sexsi treffit Free online dating usa site. All encyclopedic content. Wikipedia must be written from a neutral point of view (npov which means representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, all of the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic. Npov is a fundamental principle. Thai Hieronta Loviisa Seksiseuraa Fressi Kuopio - Julkaisut Facebook Suomalaiset Naiset Etsii Seksiseuraa Ängelholm Voksen joensuu Naked Swedish Massage Porn Videos Sex Movies Naiset Hakevat Seuraa Miehet Joensuu, 80100 Hieronta tikkurila omakuva pillu - Bedre dating Wikipedia and of other Wikimedia is also one. Wikipedia 's three core. San Sebasti n Royal Yacht Club.
This was codified with the objective of the npov policy to produce an unbiased encyclopedia. For example, to state that "According to Simon Wiesenthal, the Holocaust was a program of extermination of the Jewish people in tallinna mitä tehdä topkani kirjaudu sisään Germany, but David Irving disputes this analysis" would be to give apparent parity between the supermajority view and a tiny minority view by assigning. Since the npov policy is often unfamiliar to newcomersand is so central to Wikipedia's approachmany issues surrounding it have been covered before very extensively. For example, the article on the Earth does not 100 gratis online dating sites for single bondage og porno directly mention modern support for the flat Earth concept, the view of a distinct (and minuscule) minority; to do so would give undue weight. The verifiability policy was established in 2003 to ensure accuracy of articles by encouraging editors to cite sources. For the template, see, template:POV. This involves describing the opposing views clearly, drawing on secondary or tertiary sources that describe the disagreement from a disinterested viewpoint. Avoid the temptation to rephrase biased or opinion statements with weasel words, for example, "Many people think John Doe is the best baseball player." But "Who?" and "How many?" are natural objections. In addition, the majority view should be explained in sufficient detail that the reader can understand how the minority view differs from it, and controversies regarding aspects of the minority view should be clearly identified and explained. This does not mean that scientists cannot be questioned or challenged, but that their contributions must be properly scrutinized. Wikipedia aims to describe disputes, but not engage in them. Uncontested and uncontroversial factual assertions made by reliable sources should normally be directly stated in Wikipedia's voice.
Online dating usa today kainuu
These policies jointly determine the type and quality of material that is acceptable in Wikipedia articles, and, because they work in harmony, they should not be interpreted in isolation from one another. Views that are held by a tiny minority should not be represented except in articles devoted to those views (such as Flat Earth). A neutral characterization of disputes requires presenting viewpoints with a consistently impartial tone; otherwise articles end up as partisan commentaries even while presenting all relevant points of view. Controversial subjects Wikipedia deals with numerous areas that are frequently subjects of intense debate both in the real world and among editors of the encyclopedia. However, when reputable sources contradict one another and are relatively equal in prominence, describe both points of view and work for balance. Balance Neutrality assigns weight to viewpoints in proportion to their prominence. Biased information can usually be balanced with material cited to other sources to produce a more neutral perspective, so such problems should be fixed when possible through the normal editing process.
Iskuri net escorts st petersburg russia
Wikipedia should not present a dispute as if a view held by a small minority is as significant as the majority view. Verifiability " and no original research ". If you need help finding high-quality sources, ask other editors on the talk page of the article you are working on, or ask at the reference desk. Impartial tone See also: Wikipedia:Writing better articles Information style and tone Wikipedia describes disputes. But they will not argue over this. If you can prove a theory that few or none currently believe, Wikipedia is not the place to present such a proof. Try to achieve a more neutral text by folding debates into the narrative, rather than isolating them into sections that ignore or fight against each other. Handling neutrality disputes Attributing and specifying biased statements Further information: Wikipedia:Manual of Style Point of view Biased statements of opinion can be presented only with in-text attribution.
Suomi porno tube valtavat tissit
|thai hieronta hinta aikuisviihde ilmainen||482|
|Ilmaiset sex filmit ilmaiset videot||862|
|Seksiseuraa jkl massage sex pornhub||Remove material only where you have a good reason to believe it misinforms or misleads readers in ways that cannot be addressed by rewriting the passage. This is out of place in an encyclopedia.|
|Johanna pulkkinen video hd porn||299|
|Trenger en one night stand imatra||All encyclopedic content on Wikipedia must be written from a neutral point of view nPOV which means representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, all of the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic. Further, the passage should not be worded in any way that makes it appear thai hieronta hinta aikuisviihde ilmainen to be contested. Words to watch Main page: Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch There are no forbidden words or expressions on Wikipedia, but certain expressions should be used with care, because they may introduce bias.|